January 22 - February 3
It helps to have an overall perspective to understand our Solar System - to know what it is, it helps to know what it's not. First, get an idea of the Universe as a whole - I usually think of scales of Universe (the whole thing, oldest, began with Big Bang), Galaxy (ours is the Milky Way, contains star-forming nebulae as well as all the individual stars we see at night), and Solar System (less than half the age of Universe, just Sun and a few trivial things in its influence, formed from collapsed swirling disk). It's easy to dismiss the grand scales as too huge to contemplate, but if you can understand that there are orders of magnitude of these enormities, you can sort things into their proper scales. In general, the spaces between things are vast compared to the sizes of the things - sometimes difficult to imagine, but important to have as part of your thinking.
I like to use 3 frameworks for understanding the Solar System: what's in it, how are things arranged, and how did they get that way? What's in it, in brief: one star (most important), 4 giant (mushy) planets, 4 spherical rocky planets and a whole bunch of smaller rocky worlds (asteroids), some large number of icy worlds (most of the bit ones orbit the giant planets), and some gas and dust. Arrangement: orbits, either around Sun or around other bodies (including double worlds clearly orbiting each other), most are pretty round, mostly in a plane, mostly going 'round counterclockwise as viewed from north.
Formation overview: There was a cloud of gas & dust in space, going 'round the Galaxy. Probably due to one or more supernovae going off, the cloud became unstable and started collapsing to swirling disks, probably in multiple places. One swirling disk became our Solar System. Most of the stuff swirled to the center, where it eventually became part of the Sun. Meanwhile, the solid bits (dust) were colliding and sticking to each other, clumping up, forming larger and larger clumps. These eventually became the worlds in the Solar System. The giant planets may have been formed in sub-swirls within the disk. Meanwhile, back at the center, fusion started in the middle of the forming Sun, and eventually the energy made its way out - Sun started shining. This light (and expanding "exosphere" - aka solar wind) pushed most of the remaining tiny bits & pieces out of the system.
Tools & workings of science: Astronomy is mostly an observational science. That's different from school chemistry or (mostly) biology, in that the only experiments we can do are with models, not usually the real things. Most of the time, we "observe" - but that's not a passive activity. People get very creative about how to observe in order to figure out what they want to learn! Because the Solar System as a whole and most of the things in it are very complex systems (you just can't control the variables, even if you could do experiments), we use models to codify and test our ideas. I don't particularly mean physical models - these models are ideas, and constructions in materials or computers that represent those ideas. We have ideas and models about learning and good science teaching, too. The main tenets of the National Science Education Standards include, significantly, the Unifying Concepts and Processes. Science teaching should stress these, in order to help our students learn the connections among sciences, even the ones we're not teaching them this year.
Answers due at the end of the first week of the module
1. Use the condensation sequence to explain why Earth is chemically different from Saturn.
2. How does the learning of new science by our civilization (the nature of a scientific theory, for example) compare to the learning and teaching of science?
3. List the Unifying Concepts & Processes from the National Science Education Standards (NSES). Briefly describe each one.
4. If a cloud of gas weren't spinning (a very big "if"!) and contracted gravitationally, it would become roughly spherical. What would be the resulting shape if the gas cloud were initially spinning?
5. How did the protoplanets acquire their early internal thermal energy? (Ignore any radiation from stars.)
Due at the end of the second week of the module
Online Textbook Support (suggested but optional)
Discuss ALL Individual Activities in Team Conferences - Please offer support for each other
After individuals complete the Observing Images classification activity, team members should share their classification schemes and decide as a group how these images are best sorted. Each member of the group should turn in a short paragraph about how the group decided to sort the images and how the method differed from, or was similar to, their scheme.
1. Read the assigned readings during the first week of the module.
2. Contribute to the main discussion, which focuses on the readings and the two discussion questions. Other issues (such as the homework) are also appropriate to discuss here. Two posts required PER WEEK.
3. Contribute to your group's discussion. Most modules will have specific groupwork; this first module does not require a group submission, however. The group conferences are a good place to discuss the activities. You will need to discuss your image sorting with your group -- since one of the tasks is to describe your sorting criteria so that others can duplicate it and to decide on a group criteria. Three posts required PER WEEK.
NOTE: HALF the grade for each module is determined by discussion participation!
4. By the end of the module's first week, put your answers to the study questions into an e-mail message and send to "HW Submissions" (without the quotes). Please do not attach a file - simply type or paste the text into the body of the message. It is more than okay to discuss these in your team conference during the first week of each module.
Sometime after this, sample answers will be posted. Review them, and use it as an opportunity to clear up anything you don't understand. Note that it is sufficient to put only your answers in the e-mail, as long as they are identified by number. Please DO NOT use an attachment for your answers; it is much more efficient for us to be able to "reply" with comments to a direct message. If you attach anything that can reasonably be pasted into a message, we ignore it and you get a zero for that assignment.
5. By the end of the module's second week, put your homework into an e-mail message and send it to "HW Submissions". It should contain:
Sample answers will be posted to Module 1 shortly thereafter. If there are questions, please continue using the module 1 conference to discuss them.
These questions are to be discussed in the Module 1 Conference Folder
1. Describe your view of our Solar System. How do you think your students view our Solar System?
2. How might the Unifying Concepts and Processes relate to Comparative Planetology?
1. Which planet, of the traditional 9, fits least well with the general chemical and orbital properties of our Solar System? Justify your answer.
2. Which of the concepts related to space science do you feel are well covered by the standards and which of the concepts do you believe are no addressed well? What suggestions would you have for revising or interpreting these standards?
To return to Modules Page, click here:
last updated 1/21/02